IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/53ab162cd4714726ba2d0a71bbbb74cf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uses and Limitations of Claims-Based Performance Feedback Reports: Lessons from the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Gerteis
  • Deborah Peikes
  • Arkadipta Ghosh
  • Lori Timmins
  • Ann S. O'Malley
  • Michael Barna
  • Erin F. Taylor
  • Timothy J. Day
  • Kaylyn Swankoski
  • Perry W. Payne
  • Jr.
  • Randall Brown

Abstract

Performance feedback is central to data-driven models of quality improvement, but the use of claims-based data for feedback has received little attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Gerteis & Deborah Peikes & Arkadipta Ghosh & Lori Timmins & Ann S. O'Malley & Michael Barna & Erin F. Taylor & Timothy J. Day & Kaylyn Swankoski & Perry W. Payne & Jr. & Randall Brown, "undated". "Uses and Limitations of Claims-Based Performance Feedback Reports: Lessons from the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 53ab162cd4714726ba2d0a71b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:53ab162cd4714726ba2d0a71bbbb74cf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.lww.com/jhqonline/Abstract/2018/07000/Uses_and_Limitations_of_Claims_based_Performance.2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deborah Peikes & Grace Anglin & Stacy Dale & Erin Fries Taylor & Ann O'Malley & Arkadipta Ghosh & Kaylyn Swankoski & Jesse Crosson & Rosalind Keith & Anne Mutti & Sheila Hoag & Pragya Singh & Ha Tu & , "undated". "Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Fourth Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 31b437e81685456388e78e18b, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    performance feedback; primary care practice; data-driven quality improvement; Medicare innovation initiatives;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:53ab162cd4714726ba2d0a71bbbb74cf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.