IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/4dc1c220c1a248349b4a0ba5ad09c190.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing the Replicability of a Successful Care Management Program: Results from a Randomized Trial and Likely Explanations for Why Impacts Did Not Replicate

Author

Listed:
  • G. Greg Peterson
  • Jelena Zurovac
  • Randall S. Brown
  • Kenneth D. Coburn
  • Patricia A. Markovich
  • Sherry A. Marcantonio
  • William D. Clark
  • Anne Mutti
  • Cara Stepanczuk

Abstract

Even if demonstrated in a randomized trial, successful results from one test may not replicate in other settings or time periods.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Greg Peterson & Jelena Zurovac & Randall S. Brown & Kenneth D. Coburn & Patricia A. Markovich & Sherry A. Marcantonio & William D. Clark & Anne Mutti & Cara Stepanczuk, "undated". "Testing the Replicability of a Successful Care Management Program: Results from a Randomized Trial and Likely Explanations for Why Impacts Did Not Replicate," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4dc1c220c1a248349b4a0ba5a, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:4dc1c220c1a248349b4a0ba5ad09c190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.12595/full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John H Wasson & Lynn Ho & Laura Soloway & L Gordon Moore, 2018. "Validation of the What Matters Index: A brief, patient-reported index that guides care for chronic conditions and can substitute for computer-generated risk models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Care Management Program; Randomized Trial;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:4dc1c220c1a248349b4a0ba5ad09c190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.