IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/24565145fe9847a7ba41cfb707c68b11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Final Evaluation Report

Author

Listed:
  • David Wittenburg
  • Michael Levere
  • Sarah Croake
  • Stacy Dale
  • Noelle Denny-Brown
  • Denise Hoffman
  • Rosalind Keith
  • David Mann
  • Shauna Robinson
  • Rebecca Coughlin
  • Monica Farid
  • Heather Gordon
  • Rachel Holzwart

Abstract

This report presents process, participation, and impact findings for the Promoting Opportunity Demonstration (POD) from 2018 through 2020. POD is a randomized controlled trial that tests two versions of new SSDI work rules with a control group that is subject to current law rules.

Suggested Citation

  • David Wittenburg & Michael Levere & Sarah Croake & Stacy Dale & Noelle Denny-Brown & Denise Hoffman & Rosalind Keith & David Mann & Shauna Robinson & Rebecca Coughlin & Monica Farid & Heather Gordon &, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Final Evaluation Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 24565145fe9847a7ba41cfb70, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:24565145fe9847a7ba41cfb707c68b11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssa.gov/disabilityresearch/documents/POD_Final_Evaluation_Report.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert R. Weathers II & Jeffrey Hemmeter, 2011. "The impact of changing financial work incentives on the earnings of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 708-728, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas R. Kostøl & Andreas S. Myhre, 2021. "Labor Supply Responses to Learning the Tax and Benefit Schedule," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(11), pages 3733-3766, November.
    2. David Wittenburg & Kenneth Fortson & David Stapleton & Noelle Denny-Brown & Rosalind Keith & David R. Mann & Heinrich Hock & Heather Gordon, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Design Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a7bdd8ca145748bd892b3438d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Monika Bütler & Eva Deuchert & Michael Lechner & Stefan Staubli & Petra Thiemann, 2015. "Financial work incentives for disability benefit recipients: lessons from a randomised field experiment," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Guida Ayza Estopa, 2024. "Return-to-work policies for disability insurance recipients: The role of financial incentives," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2024 17, Stata Users Group.
    5. Zaresani, Arezou & Olivo-Villabrille, Miguel, 2022. "Return-to-work policies’ clawback regime and labor supply in disability insurance programs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Koning, Pierre & Muller, Paul & Prudon, Roger, 2022. "Do disability benefits hinder work resumption after recovery?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Heinrich Hock & David Wittenburg & Michael Levere & Noelle Denny-Brown & Heather Gordon, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Recruitment and Random Assignment Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a012f95df3d34407914ab4115, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Deuchert, Eva & Eugster, Beatrix, 2019. "Income and substitution effects of a disability insurance reform," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Arif Mamun & David Wittenburg & Noelle Denny-Brown & Michael Levere & David Mann & Rebecca Coughlin & Sarah Croake & Heather Gordon & Denise Hoffman & Rachel Holzwart & Rosalind Keith & Brittany McGil, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Interim Evaluation Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports caa99d38a8b14f968ea3438e5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. David Autor & Nicole Maestas & Kathleen Mullen & Alexander Strand, 2011. "Does Delay Cause Decay? The Effect of Administrative Decision Time on the Labor Force Participation and Earnings of Disability Applicants," Working Papers wp258, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    11. Philippe Ruh & Stefan Staubli, 2019. "Financial Incentives and Earnings of Disability Insurance Recipients: Evidence from a Notch Design," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 269-300, May.
    12. Michael Levere & David Mann & David Wittenburg, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: POD BOND Comparison Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4d5cea0b0cf843c4845033ed1, Mathematica Policy Research.
    13. Judit Krekó & Dániel Prinz & Andrea Weber, 2022. "Take-Up and Labor Supply Responses to Disability Insurance Earnings Limits," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2214, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    14. Judit Vall Castelló, 2017. "What happens to the employment of disabled individuals when all financial disincentives to work are abolished?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S2), pages 158-174, September.
    15. Andersson, Josefine, 2018. "Financial incentives to work for disability insurance recipients - Sweden’s special rules for continuous deduction," Working Paper Series 2018:7, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    16. Daniel Gubits & Judy Geyer & Denise Hoffman & Sarah Croake & Utsav Kattel & David Judkins & Stephen Bell & David Stapleton, "undated". "BOND Implementation and Evaluation: 2015 Stage 2 Interim Process, Participation, and Impact Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 933095e3c2b74e388a05cd030, Mathematica Policy Research.
    17. Myhre, Andreas, 2021. "Intensive and Extensive Margin Labor Supply Responses to Kinks in Disability Insurance Programs," MPRA Paper 109547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Sarah Croake & Monica Farid & David Wittenburg, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Summary of the Final Findings," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fd26a9987461478a92dff848c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    19. Sarah Croake & Priyanka Anand & Christopher Jones & Katherine Morrison & Cara Orfield & David Stapleton & Denise Hoffman & David R. Mann & Judy Geyer & Daniel Gubits & Stephen Bell & Andrew McGuirk & , "undated". "BOND Implementation and Evaluation: 2017 Stage 1 Interim Process, Participation, and Impact Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b00eb83020fb42e185d69f979, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. David Mann & David Wittenburg & Michael Levere, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Summary of the Interim Findings," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ec64f1982a81411a9d7168d8b, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI); demonstration project; randomized controlled trial; benefit offset; impact findings;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:24565145fe9847a7ba41cfb707c68b11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.