IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/135e82100e784dad803fe9c893cf71c7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Raising the Bar

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Seftor

Abstract

This article examines education research through the filter of a long running systematic review to assess research quality over time and the role of the systematic review in producing evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Seftor, "undated". "Raising the Bar," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 135e82100e784dad803fe9c89, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:135e82100e784dad803fe9c893cf71c7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://erx.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/09/06/0193841X16665023.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Deke & Hanley Chiang, 2017. "The WWC Attrition Standard," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 130-154, April.
    2. Jaime Thomas & Sarah A. Avellar & John Deke & Philip Gleason, 2017. "Matched Comparison Group Design Standards in Systematic Reviews of Early Childhood Interventions," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(3), pages 240-279, June.
    3. Jacob Alex Klerman, 2017. "Special Issue Editor’s Overview Essay," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(3), pages 175-182, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; content area; methodological development;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:135e82100e784dad803fe9c893cf71c7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.