IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpg/wpaper/2023_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Treu und Glauben: Frag GPT

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Engel

    (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn)

Abstract

Die Juristen haben eine gespaltene Beziehung zu Treu und Glauben. Es soll gerecht zuge-hen. Deshalb sollen treuwidrige Entscheidungen vermieden werden. Aber für den offenen Rückgriff auf normative Wertungen haben Juristen keine spezifische professionelle Kom-petenz. Dieser Beitrag macht aus der Not eine Tugend. Er interpretiert Treu und Glauben als das Gebot, grob unfaire Ergebnisse zu vermeiden, und schlägt so eine Brücke zur Ver-haltensökonomie. Vor allem bietet er aber eine Methode an, um diese Interpretation im konkreten Fall nutzbar zu machen. Das Sprachmodell GPT kann Rechtsanwender darüber informieren, wie eindeutig die konkrete Entscheidung gegen Treu und Glauben verstoßen würde.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Engel, 2023. "Treu und Glauben: Frag GPT," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2023_10, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2023_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2023_10online.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2023_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marc Martin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mppggde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.