IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mos/moswps/2013-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

FDI and Total Factor Productivity Growth: New Macro Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Botirjan Baltabaev

Abstract

Although the role of FDI in facilitating technology transfer is well-known in the literature, empirical evidence regarding the effect of FDI on growth is mixed. The contradictory results in the literature may be due to the failure to account for endogeneity and for the abortive capacity of the hosting countries. Using panel data for 49 countries over the period 1974-2008 and the existence of Investment Promotion Agencies in the receiving countries as an instrument, our results show that increased FDI stock leads to higher productivity growth. We also find a significant positive effect on the interaction between FDI stock and distance to the technological frontier, suggesting that the ability of technologically backward countries in absorbing technologies developed at the frontiers increases as more FDI stock is accumulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Botirjan Baltabaev, 2013. "FDI and Total Factor Productivity Growth: New Macro Evidence," Monash Economics Working Papers 27-13, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:mos:moswps:2013-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/eco/research/papers/2013/index.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dierk Herzer & Holger Strulik, 2020. "Religiosity and Long-Run Productivity Growth," Journal of Economics, Management and Religion (JEMAR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(01), pages 1-40, July.
    2. Ayesha Ashraf & Dierk Herzer & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2016. "The Effects of Greenfield FDI and Cross-border M&As on Total Factor Productivity," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(11), pages 1728-1755, November.
    3. Misztal Piotr, 2020. "Foreign Direct Investment, Production Factors Productivity and Income Inequalities in Selected CEE Countries," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 146-172, June.
    4. Sicong Li, 2020. "Determinants of Chinese Direct Investment in Central-East Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative Framework: A Panel Data Analysis," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 62-81, October.
    5. Sandjong Tomi, Diderot Guy D'Estaing, 2015. "Foreign direct investment, economic growth and structural transformation: The case of West African Economies and Monetary Union Countries," MPRA Paper 62230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Farzaneh KHALILI & Majid AFSHARIRAD & Abdolrahim HASHEMI DIZAJ & Mehdi YAZDANSHENAS BAHOGHOGH, 2021. "Spatial Linkage Between Quality Of Institution, Natural Resources Management With Gdp Per Capita In D8 Countries (Durbin Model In Panel Data)," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 239-256, June.
    7. Ronald Ebenezer Essel, 2023. "Foreign direct investment, technological spillover, and total factor productivity growth in Ghana," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-34, August.
    8. Chen, Guo, 2013. "Health costs, factor productivity and foreign direct investment flows," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 157717, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FDI; TFP growth; technological transfer; technology gap; system GMM;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mos:moswps:2013-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Angus (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.