IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mos/moswps/2005-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Might a Country Want to Develop its Comparative Disadvantage Industries?

Author

Listed:
  • Wenli Cheng
  • Dingsheng Zhang

Abstract

This paper develops a general equilibrium 2x2 Ricardian model that demonstrates the possibility of immiserizing growth as a result of a productivity improvement in a country's export industry. The model also shows that immiserizing growth can be avoided by improving the productivity of the country's comparative disadvantage industry. However this strategy may inflict harm on its trading partner. In comparison, a balanced growth strategy can improve welfare of the growing country without hurting its trading partner.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenli Cheng & Dingsheng Zhang, 2005. "Why Might a Country Want to Develop its Comparative Disadvantage Industries?," Monash Economics Working Papers 15/05, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:mos:moswps:2005-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/eco/research/papers/2005/1505comparativedisadvantageindustries.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jagdish N. Bhagwati, 1968. "Distortions and Immiserizing Growth: a Generalization," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 481-485.
    2. Bhagwati, Jagdish N, 1969. "Optimal Policies and Immiserizing Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(5), pages 967-970, December.
    3. Melvin, James R, 1969. "Demand Conditions and Immiserizing Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(4), pages 604-606, Part I Se.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank S. Wert, 1971. "An Examination of Endogenous and Exogenous Immiserizing Growth," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 15(2), pages 79-83, October.
    2. Minwook Kang, 2018. "Comparative advantage and strategic specialization," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Alan S Blinder, 2007. "Offshoring: Big Deal, or Business as Usual?," Working Papers 149, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    4. Nakakuki, Masayuki & Otani, Akira & Shiratsuka, Shigenori, 2004. "Distortions in Factor Markets and Structural Adjustments in the Economy," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 22(2), pages 71-99, May.
    5. Gersbach, Hans & Haller, Hans, 2013. "A human relations paradox," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 154-156.
    6. Nguyen, Cuong, 2004. "Is Economic Growth Pro-Poor in Vietnam? Evidence from the Period 1993-1998," MPRA Paper 85706, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Beladi, Hamid & Yabuuchi, Shigemi, 2001. "Tariff-induced capital inflow and welfare in the presence of unemployment and informal sector," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 51-60, January.
    8. Marcelo Bianconi, 2004. "Transfer Programs and Consumption under Alternative Insurance Schemes and Liquidity Constraints," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0411, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    9. Bai, Yan & Jin, Keyu & Lu, Dan, 2024. "Misallocation under trade liberalization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124221, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Dilip K. Ghosh, 1980. "The Non‐traded Sector, Tariff Distortion and Immiserizing Growth," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 56(154), pages 257-260, September.
    11. James Cassing & Stephen Tokarick, 2007. "Trade and growth in the presence of distortions," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 475-504.
    12. Davies, Ronald B. & Shea, Paul, 2010. "Adaptive learning with a unit root: An application to the current account," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 179-190, February.
    13. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A. & Pardey, Philip G., 1993. "Structural Adjustment In Oecd Agriculture: Government Policies And Technical Change," Working Papers 14473, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    14. Gersbach, Hans & Haller, Hans, 2013. "A human relations paradox," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 154-156.
    15. Moschini, GianCarlo & Lapan, Harvey E. & Sobolevsky, Andrei, 2000. "Trading Technology As Well As Final Products: Roundup Ready Soybean and Welfare Effects in the Soybean Complex," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5317, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. William D. Nordhaus, 1994. "Policy games: Coordination and Independece in Monetary and Fiscal Policies," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 25(2), pages 139-216.
    17. Bandyopadhyay, Subhayu & Basu, Arnab K. & Chau, Nancy H. & Mitra, Devashish, 2016. "Disentangling the Wage Impacts of Offshoring on a Developing Country: Theory and Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 9973, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Park, Jun-ki & Ryu, Deockhyun & Lee, Keun, 2019. "What determines the economic size of a nation in the world: Determinants of a nation’s share in world GDP vs. per capita GDP," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 203-214.
    19. Marcelo Bianconi, 2011. "Transfer programs under alternative insurance schemes and liquidity constraints," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 175-197.
    20. Giancarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan & Andrei Sobolevsky, 2000. "Roundup ready® soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 33-55.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    2x2 Ricardian model; immiserizing growth; balanced growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mos:moswps:2005-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Angus (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.