IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mnh/spaper/2725.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Präferenz für Intuition und Deliberation (PID) : Inventar zur Erfassung von affekt- und kognitionsbasiertem Entscheiden

Author

Listed:
  • Betsch, Cornelia

Abstract

Personen unterscheiden sich darin, ob sie bevorzugt intuitiv oder reflektiv entscheiden (Epstein et al., 1996). Um diese individuellen Unterschiede zu erfassen, wurde ein neues Fragebogenmaß konstruiert, das auf zwei unabhängigen Skalen die Präferenz für Intuition bzw. die Präferenz für Deliberation misst. Intuition wird hier, anders als bei Epstein, nicht als heuristisch-affektiver Modus verstanden, sondern als ein rein affektiver Modus. Deliberation ist konzipiert als reflektiver, kognitionsbasierter Modus. In drei Studien wird die Konstruktion, Überprüfung der Zweidimensionalität und Validierung der Skala anhand von insgesamt über 2500 Versuchspersonen berichtet. In einer konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalyse werden Fitindizes von GFI

Suggested Citation

  • Betsch, Cornelia, 2004. "Präferenz für Intuition und Deliberation (PID) : Inventar zur Erfassung von affekt- und kognitionsbasiertem Entscheiden," Papers 04-19, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    • Handle: RePEc:mnh:spaper:2725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2725/1/dp04_19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Holtfort, Thomas, 2011. "Intuition, Risikowahrnehmung und Investmententscheidungen: Behaviorale Einflussfaktoren auf das Risikoverhalten von privaten Anlegern," Arbeitspapiere der FOM 24, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:215-228 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:561-571 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Grant Soosalu & Suzanne Henwood & Arun Deo, 2019. "Head, Heart, and Gut in Decision Making: Development of a Multiple Brain Preference Questionnaire," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    6. Schunk, Daniel & Betsch, Cornelia, 2006. "Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 386-401, June.
    7. Mojzisch, Andreas & Häusser, Jan Alexander & Leder, Johannes, 2020. "The effects of option generation on post-decisional regret in everyday life decision-making: A field experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Fiedler, Klaus & Kareev, Yaakov, 2007. "Implications and ramifications of a sample-size approach to intuition," Papers 07-52, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    9. Mariela E. Jaffé & Maria Douneva & Rainer Greifeneder, 2020. "Solve the dilemma by spinning a penny? On using random decision-making aids," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(4), pages 561-571, July.
    10. Andreas Glöckner & Tilmann Betsch, 2008. "Modelling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3, pages 215-228, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mnh:spaper:2725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Katharina Rautenberg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.