IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/834.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Married Women’s Employment and Motherhood Employment Penalty by Couple’s Educational Attainments across 10 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Young Kang
  • Wonjin Lee
  • Sunyu Ham
  • Julia Shu-Huah Wang

Abstract

This study examines how and to what extent a couple’s education is associated with married women’s employment and the motherhood penalty in 10 countries. We use data from the Luxembourg Income Study and the Korean Labor & Income Panel Study (2013). Overall, Denmark and Norway show the highest level of married women’s employment and no motherhood penalty. Our findings support the opportunity cost perspective, in general, that highly educated women are more likely to participate in work than less educated women, except in Germany, Korea, and Japan. The social capital and gender-egalitarian perspectives hold for the United States and Italy. We also find significant variation in married women’s employment in East Asian countries. Married Korean women are less likely to be employed than in China and Taiwan, while Japanese women are the least employed among husband high – wife high education couples.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Young Kang & Wonjin Lee & Sunyu Ham & Julia Shu-Huah Wang, 2022. "Married Women’s Employment and Motherhood Employment Penalty by Couple’s Educational Attainments across 10 Countries," LIS Working papers 834, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/834.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.