IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/72.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Fair is the Distribution of Private Pension Benefits?

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Pestieau

Abstract

This paper examines the benefits of supplemental pension plans by comparing the costs and benefits, in terms of equity, of public retirement plans and private plans in OECD member countries, particularly focusing on the income distribution of the elderly.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Pestieau, 1992. "How Fair is the Distribution of Private Pension Benefits?," LIS Working papers 72, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/72.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheila Shaver, 1996. "Universality and Selectivity in Income Support: An Assessment of the Issues," LIS Working papers 145, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    2. Turalay Kenc & William Perraudin, 1997. "European pension systems: a simulation analysis," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 249-277, August.
    3. Miroslav Verbič & Rok Spruk, 2019. "Political economy of pension reforms: an empirical investigation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 171-232, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.