IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/657.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Discounted Labour? Disaggregating Care Work in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Naomi Lightman

Abstract

This article contrasts the earnings of high and low status care workers in Canada, the United States, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan using the micro data files of the Luxembourg Income Study. By disaggregating preexisting definitions of care work, I identify occupations with higher and lower degrees of “social closure” and reveal the concomitant care penalty and care bonus cross-nationally. In addition, I empirically measure the extent of similarities (and differences) between and within care economies in “liberal” and “productivist developmental” welfare regimes and offer support for the argument that conditions of globalization have fostered substantial convergence within the international care market.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomi Lightman, 2016. "Discounted Labour? Disaggregating Care Work in Comparative Perspective," LIS Working papers 657, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/657.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naomi Lightman, 2018. "The “Migrant in the Market”: Migration and Care Work Across Six Liberal Welfare Regimes," LIS Working papers 682, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    2. Anju Mary Paul & Jiang Haolie & Cynthia Chen, 2022. "If caring begins at home, who cares for the carers? Introducing the Global Care Policy Index," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 640-655, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.