IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kue/epaper/e-24-006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The relationship between entrepreneurs’ psychological resilience and well-being: Solving the contradictory findings using the set-theoretic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi KAWAKATSU
  • Tomoki SEKIGUCHI

Abstract

Recently, two published studies examined the relationship between psychological resilience and entrepreneurs’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. One study demonstrated that entrepreneurs’ psychological resilience was related to their well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic period, whereas the other study showed that entrepreneurs’ psychological resilience was unnecessary in maintaining well-being during the same period. We argue that these seemingly contradictory findings can be resolved by using the set-theoretic approach rather than the regression-based approach, which allows the examination of multiple causal pathways to outcomes and to differentiate and identify necessary and sufficient conditions in causality. The results of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) using the Japanese data demonstrated that psychological resilience is sufficient but not necessary condition for entrepreneurs’ well-being when a threat to the business is perceived by entrepreneurs, which is consistent with the findings of the two previous studies. Based on the findings, we propose future research to better understand the nature of entrepreneurial resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi KAWAKATSU & Tomoki SEKIGUCHI, 2024. "The relationship between entrepreneurs’ psychological resilience and well-being: Solving the contradictory findings using the set-theoretic approach," Discussion papers e-24-006, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
  • Handle: RePEc:kue:epaper:e-24-006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dp/papers/e-24-006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kue:epaper:e-24-006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Graduate School of Economics Project Center (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekyojp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.