IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kob/dpaper/196.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Empirical Test of the Efficiency Hypothesis on the Renminbi NDF in Hong Kong Market

Author

Listed:
  • Hideki Izawa

    (Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration (RIEB), Kobe University, Japan)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze empirically the efficiency hypothesis after the revaluation on July 21, 2005, using daily non-deliverable forward (NDF) renminbi rates in the Hong Kong market. The efficiency hypothesis for the renminbi NDF market is rejected. Therefore, the NDF rate is not an unbiased predictor of the future spot rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Hideki Izawa, 2006. "An Empirical Test of the Efficiency Hypothesis on the Renminbi NDF in Hong Kong Market," Discussion Paper Series 196, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    • Handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/dp196.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2006
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harendra Kumar Behera, 2011. "Onshore and offshore market for Indian rupee: recent evidence on volatility and shock spillover," Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 43-55.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Renminbi; Non-deliverable forward (NDF); Foreign exchange market efficiency hypothesis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
    • F37 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Finance Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rikobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.