IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/keo/dpaper/2016-010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An International Comparative Study of Financing Healthcare: The Case of Eight Developed Countries in 1990s- 2000s

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuaki Sato

    (Faculty of Economics, Keio University)

  • Yui Ohtsu

    (National Institute of Population and Social Security Research)

  • Shintaro Kurachi

    (Graduate School of Economics, Keio University)

  • Leo Shimamura

    (Faculty of Economics, Keio University)

  • Yasuto Dobashi

    (Institute of Contemporary British History, King's College London)

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between healthcare expenditures and fiscal structures by conducting an international comparison. The difference between a social insurance scheme and a taxation scheme has long been recognized to be a major influence on fiscal resources for medical policies, but it cannot help fully explain the ease of finance. Authors present a comparative analysis of the trend of healthcare expenditures and fiscal structures in the period from 1990 to 2010 in eight countries, namely, Japan, the Netherlands, and France on the one hand (which adopted a social insurance scheme), the U.K., Sweden, Denmark, and Norway on the other (which adopted a taxation scheme). This paper found that healthcare expenditures has increased in centralized countries that have an authority to set insurance premiums or tax rates regardless of population aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuaki Sato & Yui Ohtsu & Shintaro Kurachi & Leo Shimamura & Yasuto Dobashi, 2016. "An International Comparative Study of Financing Healthcare: The Case of Eight Developed Countries in 1990s- 2000s," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2016-010, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    • Handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2016-010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/pdf/en/DP2016-010.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    healthcare expenditure; social insurance scheme; taxation scheme; financial structure; international comparison;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2016-010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.