IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kei/dpaper/2010-018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welfare Assessment of New Retail Formats: Evidence from Japan's Retail Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Toshiyuki Matsuura

    (Institute for Economic and Industrial Studies, Keio University)

  • Mitsuru Sunada

    (School of Economics, Osaka Prefecture University)

Abstract

This study attempts to measure the welfare gain caused by new retailer entries. In Japan, following the deregulation of entry restriction on large-scale retail stores, specialty supermarket stores, and convenience stores expanded their market share. We estimate the consumer benefit by incorporating the differences in service quality as well as differences in price among retail formats and demonstrate that welfare improvements are primarily explained by changes in service quality, and that the effects of the deregulation are in fact limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Toshiyuki Matsuura & Mitsuru Sunada, 2010. "Welfare Assessment of New Retail Formats: Evidence from Japan's Retail Industry," Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Discussion Paper Series 2010-018, Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Program.
    • Handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2010-018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.keio.ac.jp/old_project/old/gcoe-econbus/pdf/dp/DP2010-018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keiichiro HONDA & Toshiyuki MATSUURA & Takeshi MIZUTA, 2017. "Welfare Assessment of Entry of New Retail Formats and Deregulation for Restriction on Large Retail Scale Stores in Japan," Economic Analysis, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), vol. 194, pages 45-64, May.
    2. Yishao Shi & Danxuan Liu, 2020. "Relationship between Urban New Business Indexes and the Business Environment of Chinese Cities: A Study Based on Entropy-TOPSIS and a Gaussian Process Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2010-018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Global COE Program Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.