Author
Listed:
- Kostiantyn Ovsiannikov
(Research Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)
- Koji Kotani
(Research Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)
- Hodaka Morita
Abstract
With the advance of the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies in the world have embraced telework. Despite the large volume of related studies, telework has not been well documented in relation to work formats and assignments. We pose an open question of how productivity in an online or telework environment (i.e., online productivity) depends on work formats (individual vs. group) and types of assignments (routine vs. creative), hypothesizing that online productivity is low as compared to face-to-face productivity for creative tasks in a group format. We conducted the stratified questionnaire survey with 500 Japanese employees, collecting the data of their perceived online productivity for carrying out simple and creative tasks in individual and group formats as compared to face-to-face productivity. The three main findings are obtained. First, online productivity tends to be low for a group format as compared to an individual format. Second, in a group format, online productivity is higher for routine than for creative tasks. Third, online productivity is unconditionally exacerbated in organizations with a seniority-based wage system as compared to those with a performancebased one. Overall, our findings highlight a “telework dilemma†whereby online productivity is perceived to be low as compared to face-to-face one in a group format irrespective of the types of assignments, while a majority of people are willing to continue telework. To resolve it, some new measures or approaches shall be necessary to digitally enhance group operations in an online environment.
Suggested Citation
Kostiantyn Ovsiannikov & Koji Kotani & Hodaka Morita, "undated".
"Online productivity and types of assignments in a Japanese workplace,"
Working Papers
SDES-2025-2, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management.
Handle:
RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2025-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2025-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sachiko Minami (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/smkocjp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.