IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jrs/wpaper/202310.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flood protection gap: evidence for public finances and insurance premiums

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Climate-related physical risks pose serious concerns for both public and private finances, and is of utmost importance to contain economic losses when natural catastrophes occur. Against this background, the paper models the impact of currently uninsured flood events on the economy and estimates its overall costs for the EU27. First, the paper estimates the share of premiums associated with insured flood events over total premiums. Then, it investigates the extra premiums written needed to close the flood protection gap by requiring all EU countries to have at least a minimum level of insurance protection. The results show that insurance premiums written should at least be doubled to reach a harmonized level of penetration equal to 50%. Third, the paper proposes a stylised approach to quantify the potential economic losses associated with uninsured flood events at different levels of insurance penetration, when the insurance protection fails due to defaults in the insurance sector. The model can be used to assess the size of loss that might affect public finances if no preventive measures are taken to increase society's resilience against climate and weather-related risks and compare it with a safeguard mechanism under a 'worst case' scenario. The results show that losses affecting public finances might amount to EUR 27 billion today. Under an alternative scenario accounting for an increase in insured losses due to an uptake in the insurance sector, losses would decrease by up to 50%.

Suggested Citation

  • Bellia, Mario & Di Girolamo, Francesca & Pagano, Andrea & Petracco Giudici, Marco, 2023. "Flood protection gap: evidence for public finances and insurance premiums," Working Papers 2023-10, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
  • Handle: RePEc:jrs:wpaper:202310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC135372
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Physical risk; flood events; insurance; protection gap; insurance premiums;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jrs:wpaper:202310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Benczur (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eejrcit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.