Author
Abstract
This article contributes to a clear understanding of important aspects of economic globalization. Specifically, we want to highlight the distributional concerns and how these are related to efficiency aspects of globalization. To this end, we identify relevant scenarios within a simple model of international trade featuring two groups of households who differ in both preferences and sector specific endowments. We address two kinds of scenarios which appear particularly topical: An abolition of agricultural protection, and an increase in import competition from low wage coutnries. All scenarios considered have severe redistributive consequences which our model identifies as a real income loss or gain, respectively, for one of the two groups of households. But, absent further distortions, a liberalization scenario will also feature an efficiency gain which implies that any real income loss may be fully compensated for by means of direct transfer payments. Globalization scenarios may, however, also entail a real income loss for the economy as a whole if they entail a deterioration of the terms-of-trade. In such a case, redistributive consequences may not be fully undone by means of compensation payments. A fortiori, then, full compensation cannot be achieved through trade restrictions either. Globlization scenarios may thus entail, not only distributional consequences, but also an aggregate welfare loss for an individual country. But responding with trade restrictions will aggravate the problem by inflicting a further real income loss on such a country. Efficienca gains may be jeopardized by rigid vactor prices and adverse incentives from compensation payments.
Suggested Citation
Wilhelm Kohler & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2000.
"Effizienz- und Verteilungswirkungen der Handelsliberalisierung,"
Economics working papers
2000-12, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
Handle:
RePEc:jku:econwp:2000_12
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jku:econwp:2000_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: René Böheim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vlinzat.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.