IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jet/dpaper/dpaper476.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From foot-draggers to strategic counter-partners : the dynamics of U.S. and Chinese policies for tackling climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Fang-Ting

Abstract

As can been seen from the U.S.'s non-ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, together with the negotiations toward the post-Kyoto Protocol framework, the U.S. and China have been quarrelling over their responsibilities and have contradicted one another over the introduction of compulsory domestic greenhouse gases emission reduction targets. Therefore, for a long time, it has been argued that the controversy between the two countries has hindered the process of forging an international agreement to deal with climate change. On the other hand, Sino-U.S. bilateral cooperation on climate change has significantly increased in recent years in summit talks and their Strategic & Economic Dialogue (S&ED), especially after the 15th Conference of Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen, one of whose aims was to facilitate positive negotiations for the post-Kyoto Protocol agreement. Analyzing this in the light of recent developments, we find that the U.S. and China have tended to address climate change and related issues from a pluralistic viewpoint and approach, by regarding the achievement of bilateral cooperation and global agreements as their common strategic objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Fang-Ting, 2014. "From foot-draggers to strategic counter-partners : the dynamics of U.S. and Chinese policies for tackling climate change," IDE Discussion Papers 476, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    • Handle: RePEc:jet:dpaper:dpaper476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.ide.go.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=37700&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robyn Eckersley, 2012. "Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 12(2), pages 24-42, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Katharina Michaelowa, 2017. "Resourcing International Organisations: So What?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 113-123, August.
    2. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "Trust Funds as a Lever of Influence at International Development Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 85-95, August.
    3. James Ford & Michelle Maillet & Vincent Pouliot & Thomas Meredith & Alicia Cavanaugh, 2016. "Adaptation and Indigenous peoples in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 429-443, December.
    4. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s5:p:113-123 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nicholas Chan, 2021. "Beyond delegation size: developing country negotiating capacity and NGO ‘support’ in international climate negotiations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 201-217, June.
    6. Anna A. Klis, 2019. "Identity and equal treatment in negative externality agreements," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 615-630, December.
    7. Alexandre Gajevic Sayegh, 0. "Moral duties, compliance and polycentric climate governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    8. Robert Falkner, 2015. "A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits and international legitimacy," GRI Working Papers 197, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    9. Federica Genovese & Richard J. McAlexander & Johannes Urpelainen, 2023. "Institutional roots of international alliances: Party groupings and position similarity at global climate negotiations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 329-359, April.
    10. Thomas Hale, 2020. "Catalytic Cooperation," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 73-98, Autumn.
    11. Berna Edoardo Berionni, 2013. "Regionalizzare la tutela dell?ambiente? Verso una sostenibilit? su scala regionale: il caso dell?UE e dell?ASEAN," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 107-128.
    12. Steven Slaughter, 2017. "The G20 and Climate Change: The Transnational Contribution of Global Summitry," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 285-293, September.
    13. Naghmeh Nasiritousi & Alexandra Buylova & Mathias Fridahl & Gunilla Reischl, 2024. "Making the UNFCCC fit for purpose: A research agenda on vested interests and green spiralling," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 487-494, May.
    14. Jan Kersting & Vicki Duscha & Matthias Weitzel, 2017. "Cooperation on Climate Change under Economic Linkages: How the Inclusion of Macroeconomic Effects Affects Stability of a Global Climate Coalition," The Energy Journal, , vol. 38(4), pages 19-42, July.
    15. Harro Asselt & Fariborz Zelli, 2014. "Connect the dots: managing the fragmentation of global climate governance," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 16(2), pages 137-155, April.
    16. Alexandre Gajevic Sayegh, 2020. "Moral duties, compliance and polycentric climate governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 483-506, September.
    17. Achim Hagen & Leonhard Kaehler & Klaus Eisenack, 2016. "Transnational Environmental Agreements with Heterogeneous Actors," Working Papers V-387-16, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2016.
    18. Pickering, Jonathan & Jotzo, Frank & Wood, Peter J., 2015. "Splitting the difference: can limited coordination achieve a fair distribution of the global climate financing effort?," Working Papers 249508, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    19. Oscar Widerberg & Idil Boran & Sander Chan & Andrew Deneault & Marcel Kok & Katarzyna Negacz & Philipp Pattberg & Matilda Petersson, 2023. "Finding synergies and trade‐offs when linking biodiversity and climate change through cooperative initiatives," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 157-161, February.
    20. Piero Morseletto & Frank Biermann & Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 655-676, October.
    21. Robert Gampfer, 2016. "Minilateralism or the UNFCCC? The Political Feasibility of Climate Clubs," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 62-88, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    China; United States; Climatic change; Foreign relations; Environmental problems; Climate change; Mitigation; Adaptation; Copenhagen Accord; Cancun Agreement; UNFCCC; Sino-U.S. relationship; U.S.-China Strategic & Economic Dialogue (S&ED);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jet:dpaper:dpaper476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michitaka Imamitsu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.