IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp15720.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Physical Isolation and Loneliness: Evidence from COVID Lockdowns in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Kong, Nancy

    (University of Sydney)

  • Lam, Jack

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

Using mandatory stay-at-home orders in Australia as a natural experiment and data from a long-running panel study, this paper investigates the causal link between physical isolation and loneliness. We exploit variations in the number of lockdown days in 2020 the respondent had experienced up until the interview date to estimate the causal link and find, based on difference-in-differences analyses with three-way fixed-effects estimations, that the number of days in lockdown does not significantly affect loneliness. Further, we use triple differences to examine heterogeneous effects. For income, age, personality, living arrangements, and remoteness, we find insignificant effects; for extroverts and young people, we find weak significance. We investigate exclusion restrictions through channels such as social contacts, internet access, job industry, and household characteristics on loneliness. Whereas many believe that 'being alone' and 'being lonely' are similar concepts, our study provides the first empirical causal evidence of no links between the two. Our findings also refine understanding of social isolation and demonstrate that it likely encompasses factors other than physical isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kong, Nancy & Lam, Jack, 2022. "Physical Isolation and Loneliness: Evidence from COVID Lockdowns in Australia," IZA Discussion Papers 15720, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp15720.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimiliano Tani & Zhiming Cheng & Matloob Piracha & Ben Zhe Wang, 2022. "Ageing, Health, Loneliness and Wellbeing," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 791-807, April.
    2. Eun Young Choi & Mateo P Farina & Qiao Wu & Jennifer Ailshire, 2022. "COVID-19 Social Distancing Measures and Loneliness Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(7), pages 167-178.
    3. Heather R Fuller & Andrea Huseth-Zosel, 2022. "Older Adults’ Loneliness in Early COVID-19 Social Distancing: Implications of Rurality," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(7), pages 100-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    2. Chiara Burlina & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2023. "Alone and lonely. The economic cost of solitude for regions in Europe," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 2067-2087, November.
    3. Barjaková, Martina & Garnero, Andrea & d’Hombres, Béatrice, 2023. "Risk factors for loneliness: A literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    4. Hung Viet Nguyen & Haewon Byeon, 2022. "Explainable Deep-Learning-Based Depression Modeling of Elderly Community after COVID-19 Pandemic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19; loneliness; physical isolation; lockdown; natural experiment; quasi-experimental design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.