IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/termod/202403.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the drivers of irregular spending in the EU Cohesion policy: A Fractional Regression Analysis

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The regularity and legality of EU spending, i.e. the conformity of incurred expenditures with relevant legislation, is an important measure of efficiency. It is also a key pre-condition for the effectiveness of EU funds. The present paper aims to understand the main determinants of irregular spending in EU cohesion policy funding: this is a highly important, yet understudied topic, especially given that cohesion policy is the area of the EU budget with the highest levels of irregularities. Using time series data and a fractional regression analysis model, the study provides evidence that the specific governance and structure of cohesion policy programmes can explain the intensity of irregular spending. Overall, the analysis finds that the higher the complexity of programmes (e.g. in terms of number of priorities, multi-fund focus), the higher the risk of irregularities and difficulty to detect them by programme authorities. The paper also shows the relevant role of specific aspects of the implementation, such as the size and number of projects, in influencing the regularity of expenditures. The results suggest that more simplification, greater thematic concentration and funds’ rules harmonization could bring benefits in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • FOGLIA Francesco & MOLICA Francesco & MARQUES SANTOS Anabela, 2024. "Exploring the drivers of irregular spending in the EU Cohesion policy: A Fractional Regression Analysis," JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis 2024-03, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:termod:202403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC138827
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:termod:202403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.