IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipp/wpaper/1905.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agroforestry Accounting System Environmental Incomes Compared With Sna And Seea-Eea At Corporation Scale: Applications To Holm Oak Dehesas In Andalusia-Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Campos
  • José L. Oviedo
  • Alejandro Álvarez
  • Paola Ovando
  • Bruno Mesa
  • Alejandro Caparrós

Abstract

Corporations and governments face the challenge of dealing with new demands from social actors to make visible their individual economic activity environmental incomes that they accrue from ecosystem service (ES) and changes in adjusted environmental net worth (CNWead). The System of National Accounts (SNA), the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting-Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EEA) and the experimental Agroforestry Accounting System (AAS) frameworks are the basis of their comparative refined applications in this research. Our objectives are to measure and aggregate, in a consistent way, the farmer and government individual activity ecosystem services, incomes and environmental assets measured in the same individual dehesa (farm) territorial units. We compare the results of the above three accounting frameworks in 16 large mixed holm oak dehesas (HODs) which are privately-owned by non-industrial landowners (famers) in Andalusia, Spain, and where farmers manage twelve economic activities and the Andalusian regional government manages seven economic activities. In these HODs the economic activities are valued at basic prices by the refined SNA and at social prices by the refined SEEA-EEA and the simplified AAS. Social price in this study is estimated by adding the farmer voluntary unitary opportunity cost twofold, as intermediate product and own intermediate consumption, to the individual activities valued at basic prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Campos & José L. Oviedo & Alejandro Álvarez & Paola Ovando & Bruno Mesa & Alejandro Caparrós, 2019. "Agroforestry Accounting System Environmental Incomes Compared With Sna And Seea-Eea At Corporation Scale: Applications To Holm Oak Dehesas In Andalusia-Spain," Working Papers 1905, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipp:wpaper:1905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://investigacion.cchs.csic.es/RePEc/ipp/wpaper/2019_05_ippwp_campos.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McElroy, Michael B, 1976. "Capital Gains and Social Income," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 14(2), pages 221-240, June.
    2. Campos, Pablo & Daly-Hassen, Hamed & Oviedo, José L. & Ovando, Paola & Chebil, Ali, 2008. "Accounting for single and aggregated forest incomes: Application to public cork oak forests in Jerez (Spain) and Iteimia (Tunisia)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 76-86, March.
    3. Angelsen, Arild & Jagger, Pamela & Babigumira, Ronnie & Belcher, Brian & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Bauch, Simone & Börner, Jan & Smith-Hall, Carsten & Wunder, Sven, 2014. "Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 12-28.
    4. Ovando, Paola & Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2016. "Ecosystem accounting for measuring total income in private and public agroforestry farms," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 43-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & Álvarez, Alejandro & Mesa, Bruno & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2019. "The role of non-commercial intermediate services in the valuations of ecosystem services: Application to cork oak farms in Andalusia, Spain," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Campos, Pablo & Caparrós, Alejandro & Oviedo, José L. & Ovando, Paola & Álvarez-Farizo, Begoña & Díaz-Balteiro, Luis & Carranza, Juan & Beguería, Santiago & Díaz, Mario & Herruzo, A. Casimiro & Martín, 2019. "Bridging the Gap Between National and Ecosystem Accounting Application in Andalusian Forests, Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 218-236.
    3. Campos, Pablo & Álvarez, Alejandro & Mesa, Bruno & Oviedo, José L. & Ovando, Paola & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2020. "Total income and ecosystem service sustainability index: Accounting applications to holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & Álvarez, Alejandro & Ovando, Paola & Mesa, Bruno & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2020. "Measuring environmental incomes beyond standard national and ecosystem accounting frameworks: testing and comparing the agroforestry Accounting System in a holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Campos, Pablo & Mesa, Bruno & Álvarez, Alejandro & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2022. "Towards measuring environmental income through a refined United Nations SEEA EA: Application to publicly-owned, protected, pine-forest-farm case studies in Andalusia, Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Narita, Daiju & Lemenih, Mulugeta & Shimoda, Yukimi & Ayana, Alemayehu N., 2018. "Economic Accounting of Ethiopian Forests: A Natural Capital Approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97, pages 189-200.
    7. Campos, Pablo & Álvarez, Alejandro & Mesa, Bruno & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2021. "Linking standard Economic Account for Forestry and ecosystem accounting: Total forest incomes and environmental assets in publicly-owned conifer farms in Andalusia-Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Ovando, Paola & Campos, Pablo & Oviedo, José L. & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2016. "Ecosystem accounting for measuring total income in private and public agroforestry farms," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 43-51.
    9. Narita, Daiju & Lemenih, Mulugeta & Shimoda, Yukimi & Ayana, Alemayehu N., 2018. "Economic accounting of ethiopian forests: A natural capital approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 189-200.
    10. Shackleton, C.M. & Garekae, H. & Sardeshpande, M. & Sinasson Sanni, G. & Twine, W.C., 2024. "Non-timber forest products as poverty traps: Fact or fiction?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Evelyn Asante-Yeboah & George Ashiagbor & Kwabena Asubonteng & Stefan Sieber & Justice C. Mensah & Christine Fürst, 2022. "Analyzing Variations in Size and Intensities in Land Use Dynamics for Sustainable Land Use Management: A Case of the Coastal Landscapes of South-Western Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Mugido, Worship & Shackleton, Charlie M., 2019. "The contribution of NTFPS to rural livelihoods in different agro-ecological zones of South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    14. Dai, Xuhuan & Li, Bo & Zheng, Hua & Yang, Yanzheng & Yang, Zihan & Peng, Chenchen, 2023. "Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Bierkamp, Sina & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2021. "Environmental income and remittances: Evidence from rural central highlands of Vietnam," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Ximena Rueda & Andrea Paz & Theodora Gibbs‐Plessl & Ronald Leon & Byron Moyano & Eric F Lambin, 2018. "Smallholders at a Crossroad: Intensify or Fall behind? Exploring Alternative Livelihood Strategies in a Globalized World," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, February.
    17. Joos-Vandewalle, S. & Wynberg, R. & Alexander, K.A., 2018. "Dependencies on natural resources in transitioning urban centers of northern Botswana," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PC), pages 342-349.
    18. Ahammad, Ronju & Stacey, Natasha & Sunderland, Terry C.H., 2019. "Use and perceived importance of forest ecosystem services in rural livelihoods of Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 87-98.
    19. Mumbunan, Sonny & Maitri, Ni Made Rahayu, 2022. "A Review of Basic Income for Nature and Climate," OSF Preprints bre43, Center for Open Science.
    20. Tilahun, Mesfin & Damnyag, Lawrence & Anglaaere, Luke C.N., 2016. "The Ankasa Forest Conservation Area of Ghana: Ecosystem service values and on-site REDD+ opportunity cost," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 168-176.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipp:wpaper:1905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adelheid Holl (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ippcses.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.