Author
Listed:
- Vicente Correia Lima Neto
- Rômulo Dante Orrico Filho
Abstract
O transporte público consiste em uma função pública de interesse comum (Fpic), sendo base constitucional para a formulação de regiões metropolitanas (RMs) por parte da entidade de governo estadual. Este texto desenvolve uma análise crítica a partir de diversos relatórios estaduais do projeto Governança Metropolitana para quatorze RMs brasileiras, com base em quatro fatores: i) legalidade do serviço; ii) uso do consórcio público como arranjo de governança; iii) presença de planos de mobilidade nos âmbitos metropolitano e municipal; e iv) distribuição de recursos do Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento (PAC). As experiências apontam evidências de possíveis soluções. Os casos de maior organização e sistematização da gestão do transporte metropolitano decorrem de um estado mais presente no planejamento desta função, estruturando instrumentos de planejamento e coordenando o processo de coesão dos municípios The public transportation is known as a public service of common interest and it is the constitutional basis for the formulation of metropolitan areas by the states governments. This article develops a critical analysis from fourteen Brazilian metropolitan regions reports of the Metropolitan Governance project. The appraisal is based on four factors: the legality of the service, the use of public consortium as a governance arrangement, the presence of mobility plans at metropolitan or municipal level and the distribution of funds from the Brazilian`s Growth Acceleration Program. The cases shows evidence of possible solutions. The best cases of the metropolitan transport management processes are related with a more present state in the metropolitan transportation planning, helping with the structuring planning tools and coordinating the process of cohesion of the municipalities.
Suggested Citation
Vicente Correia Lima Neto & Rômulo Dante Orrico Filho, 2015.
"A Governança Metropolitana da Mobilidade: uma análise a partir dos estados,"
Discussion Papers
2151, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
Handle:
RePEc:ipe:ipetds:2151
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:2151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.