IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ins/quaeco/qf1901.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Insights on the Theory of Robust Games

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Paolo Crespi

    (Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Italy)

  • Matteo Rocca

    (Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Italy)

  • Davide Radi

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Restricting the attention to static games, we consider the problem of ambiguity generated by uncertain values of players’ payoff functions. Uncertainty is represented by a bounded set of possible realizations, and the level of uncertainty is parametrized in such a way that zero means no uncertainty, the so-called nominal counterpart game, and one the maximum uncertainty. Assuming that agents are ambiguity averse and they adopt the worst-case optimization approach to uncertainty, we employ the robust-optimization techniques to obtain a so-called robust game, see Aghassi and Bertsimas (2006). A robust game is a distribution-free model to handle ambiguity in a conservative way. The equilibria of this game are called robustoptimization equilibria and the existence is guaranteed by standard regularity conditions. The paper investigates the sensitivity to the level of uncertainty of the equilibrium outputs of a robust game. Defining the opportunity cost of uncertainty as the extra profit that a player would obtain by reducing his level of uncertainty, keeping fixed the actions of the opponents, we prove that a robust-optimization equilibrium is an e-Nash equilibrium of the nominal counterpart game where the -approximation measures the opportunity cost of uncertainty. Moreover, considering an e-Nash equilibrium of a nominal game, we prove that it is always possible to introduce uncertainty such that the e-Nash equilibrium is a robust-optimization equilibrium. Under some regularity conditions on the payoff functions, we also show that a robust-optimization equilibrium converges smoothly towards a Nash equilibrium of the nominal counterpart game, when the level of uncertainty vanishes. Despite these analogies, the equilibrium outputs of a robust game may be qualitatively different from the ones of the nominal counterpart. An example shows that a robust Cournot duopoly model can admit multiple and asymmetric robust-optimization equilibria despite the nominal counterpart is a simple symmetric game with linear-quadratic payoff functions for which only a symmetric Nash equilibrium exists

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Paolo Crespi & Matteo Rocca & Davide Radi, 2019. "Insights on the Theory of Robust Games," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf1901, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
  • Handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf1901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Macgregor Perry, 2021. "Analyzing a Complex Game for the South China Sea Fishing Dispute using Response Surface Methodologies," Papers 2110.12568, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2021.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ambiguity aversion; worst-case optimization; robust games;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf1901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Segreteria Dipartimento (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feinsit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.