IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ind/igiwpp/2016-026.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Long road to transformation of agricultural markets in India: Lessons from Karnataka

Author

Listed:
  • Nidhi Aggarwal

    (Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research)

  • Sargam Jain

    (Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research)

  • Sudha Narayanan

    (Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research)

Abstract

This paper examines Karnataka's pioneering agricultural output marketing reforms with the twin goals of assessing the state and challenges of implementation and to glean lessons from Karnataka's experience for India's e-National Agricultural Market (e-NAM). Through a field study of ten mandis across the state, we find that while Karnataka has been consistently pushing through with reforms, in the context of deeply entrenched relationships between farmers, traders and com- mission agents, the challenges of deeper reforms are significant. We argue that Karnataka's experience suggests that agricultural market reform in India rests on three pillars - institutions that establish the rules of the game, incentives for agents to participate actively in the market and infrastructure to support the modernised trading platform. Unless reforms address all these three issues simultaneously, they are unlikely to succeed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nidhi Aggarwal & Sargam Jain & Sudha Narayanan, 2016. "The Long road to transformation of agricultural markets in India: Lessons from Karnataka," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2016-026, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    • Handle: RePEc:ind:igiwpp:2016-026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2016-026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chengappa, P.G. & Arun, M. & Yadava, C.G. & Prasanna Kumar, H.M., 2012. "IT Application in Agricultural Marketing Service Delivery — Electronic Tender System in Regulated Markets," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 25(Conferenc).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bisena, J & Kumar, R, 2018. "Agricultural marketing reforms and e-national agricultural market (e-NAM) in India: a review," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(2).
    2. Sanjay Chaudhary & P. K. Suri, 2021. "Ranking the Factors Influencing e-Trading Usage in Agricultural Marketing," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(3), pages 233-249, September.
    3. Chandra Sekhara Rao Nuthalapati & Yogesh Bhatt & Susanto K Beero, 2020. "Is the Electronic Market the Way Forward to Overcome Market Failures?," IEG Working Papers 387, Institute of Economic Growth.
    4. Pavithra, S & Gracy, CP & Saxena, R. & Patil, G.G., 2018. "Innovations in agricultural marketing: a case study of e-tendering system in Karnataka, India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(1).
    5. A. Amarender Reddy & Mehjabeen, 2019. "Electronic National Agricultural Markets, Impacts, Problems and Way Forward," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 143-155, July.
    6. Nidhi Aggarwal & Sudha Narayanan, 2017. "Impact of India's demonetization on domestic agricultural markets," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2017-023, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    7. Sanjay Chaudhary & P. K. Suri, 2022. "Modelling the Enablers of e-Trading Adoption in Agricultural Marketing: A TISM-Based Analysis of eNAM," Vision, , vol. 26(1), pages 65-79, March.
    8. Khandagiri, Chandan & Kannan, Elumalai, 2022. "Performance analysis of electronic national agricultural markets: some evidence from Odisha," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 35(2), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damodar Jena & Debasish Mohapatra & Saswat Kumar Pani & Sonali Patnaik & Nishith Ranjan Parida & Itishree Panda & Abdulkarem Daoun, 2023. "E-Marketing of Agriculture Commodities: Challenges and Prospects for Marginal and Small Farmers in India," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 9(1), pages 42-48, 01-2023.
    2. Chandra Sekhara Rao Nuthalapati & Yogesh Bhatt & Susanto K Beero, 2020. "Is the Electronic Market the Way Forward to Overcome Market Failures?," IEG Working Papers 387, Institute of Economic Growth.
    3. Pavithra, S & Gracy, CP & Saxena, R. & Patil, G.G., 2018. "Innovations in agricultural marketing: a case study of e-tendering system in Karnataka, India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(1).
    4. Bisena, J & Kumar, R, 2018. "Agricultural marketing reforms and e-national agricultural market (e-NAM) in India: a review," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    eNAM; Karnataka Model; Mandi reforms; APMC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance
    • Q02 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Commodity Market

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ind:igiwpp:2016-026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamprasad M. Pujar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igidrin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.