IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ind/cdswpp/368.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modernity with democracy?: Gender and governance in the people's planning campaign, Keralam

Author

Listed:
  • J. Devika

    (Centre for Development Studies)

Abstract

This paper takes advantage of the possibility of a critical perspective afforded by the feminist perspective in analyzing the interactions between political and civil societies in the shaping of specific developmental interventions by the state, to examine the People's Planning Campaign (PPC) in Keralam. Implemented in the mid-90s, this was hailed as an important experiment in mainstreaming gender concerns in development. The objectives of this paper go beyond reporting on the degree of success/failure of the effort at mainstreaming gender concerns in the PPC, though it draws upon many such reports. It will raise a few questions essentially historical in nature: given the fact that political society in Keralam has never displayed any acute concern for gender justice, and that this was a marginal issue even within civil society here, under what conditions did it come to be acknowledged as a key element in a political experiment as momentous as the PPC? Gender justice has been addressed in people's planning (at least in some locations, to some extent) in some specific ways, excluding other ways- what determines this selection process?. In the first section of this paper I trace the emergence of civil and political societies in 20th century Keralam, with special attention to the ways in which they have been gendered, and simultaneously worked as gendering spaces. This account may help us to understand how gender justice came to be both `in' and `out', at one and the same time, in the momentous political experiment of the PPC. In the second section, several points of agreement between numerous reports on gender and governance in the PPC are taken up and discussed in the wider historical context. These reports generally point out, for instance, that that the active involvement of social movements like the KSSP in democratic decentralization has not effected a significant change in the general attitude of misogyny prevalent in political society. The conclusion considers the implications of some of two significant developments-the entry of women into local governance, and the wide reach attained by the women SHGs _ for the future of gender politics in Kerala.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Devika, 2005. "Modernity with democracy?: Gender and governance in the people's planning campaign, Keralam," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 368, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.
  • Handle: RePEc:ind:cdswpp:368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cds.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/wp368.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mridul Eapen & Praveena Kodoth, 2002. "Family structure, women's education and work: Re-examining the high status of women in Kerala," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 341, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.
    2. J. Devika, 2002. "Imagining women's social space in early modern Keralam," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 329, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K Rajesh, 2010. "Reproduction of Institutions through People’s Practices: Evidences from a Gram Panchayat in Kerala," Working Papers 254, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    2. J. Devika & Binitha V. Thampi, 2007. "Between ‘Empowerment’ and ‘Liberation’," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 33-60, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonia George, 2013. "Enabling Subjectivities: Economic and Cultural Negotiations—A Gendered Reading of the Handloom Sector and the Special Economic Zone of Kerala," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 305-334, June.
    2. Tasnim Khan & Rana Ejaz Ali Khan, 2009. "Urban Informal Sector: How Much Women Are Struggling for Family Survival," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 67-95.
    3. J Devika, 2006. "Modernity with Democracy?: Gender and Governance in the People's Planning Campaign, Keralam," Working Papers id:744, eSocialSciences.
    4. Panda, Pradeep & Agarwal, Bina, 2005. "Marital violence, human development and women's property status in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 823-850, May.
    5. N. Vijayamohanan Pillai, 2004. "CES function, generalised mean and human poverty index: Exploring some links," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 360, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender Justice; Framework of Democracy; Framework of Modernity; Civil Society; Political Society;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ind:cdswpp:368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamprasad M. Pujar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdsacin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.