IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/992235613402676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Changing patterns of rural women's employment, production and reproduction in China

Author

Listed:
  • Croll E.

Abstract

Working paper on trends in rural women's labour force participation and fertility patterns in China. Examines rural development policy based on the responsibility of the individual, household or work brigade for agricultural production. Covers women workers in agricultural employment and rural industry, household income, living conditions, marriage, family planning, sex discrimination, women's organizations and political participation. Includes case studies of two communes. References.

Suggested Citation

  • Croll E., 1983. "Changing patterns of rural women's employment, production and reproduction in China," ILO Working Papers 992235613402676, International Labour Organization.
  • Handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992235613402676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1984/84B09_181_engl.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Croll, Elisabeth J., 1983. "Production versus reproduction: A threat to China's development strategy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 467-481, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stokes, C. Shannon, 1984. "The Responsibility System and Human Fertility in the People's Republic of China: Possible Conflicts of the New Policies with Demographic Goals," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279068, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Ashwani Saith, 1984. "China's New Population Policies: Rationale and Some Implications," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 321-358, July.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:223561 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992235613402676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vesa Sivunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.