IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/992154743402676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Criteria for rural road planning

Author

Listed:
  • Howe, J.

Abstract

Working paper on comparison of evaluation techniques for rural area road planning in developing countries - discusses evolution of road network and the selection criteria used and proposed for the formulation of rural road construction and improvement programmes (incl. Highway sufficiency ratings, road user cost benefit analysis and social change considerations), notices that income distribution effects were not explicitly identified in criteria formulation, and includes suggestions for improvement. References.

Suggested Citation

  • Howe, J., 1981. "Criteria for rural road planning," ILO Working Papers 992154743402676, International Labour Organization.
    • Handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992154743402676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1981/81B09_906_engl.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Otto Eckstein, 1961. "A Survey of the Theory of Public Expenditure Criteria," NBER Chapters, in: Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, pages 439-504, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez, Humberto, 2008. "The social discount rate : estimates for nine Latin American countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4639, The World Bank.
    2. Guadalupe Souto Nieves, 2003. "El descuento social," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 165(2), pages 99-126, June.
    3. Aidan R. Vining & David L. Weimer, 2013. "An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit–cost analysis to social policy," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 1, pages 25-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Monika Foltyn-Zarychta & Rafał Buła & Krystian Pera, 2021. "Discounting for Energy Transition Policies—Estimation of the Social Discount Rate for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Schmid, A. Allan, 2004. "Economic Analysis And Efficiency In Public Expenditure," Staff Paper Series 11776, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    6. Walter Hettich, 1976. "Distribution in Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Review of Theoretical Issues," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(2), pages 123-150, April.
    7. Eli P. Fenichel & Matthew J. Kotchen & Ethan T. Addicott, 2017. "Even the Representative Agent Must Die: Using Demographics to Inform Long-Term Social Discount Rates," NBER Working Papers 23591, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Revesz, Richard & Stavins, Robert, 2004. "Environmental Law and Policy," Working Paper Series rwp04-023, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Beatrice Cherrier & Jean-Baptiste Fleury, 2017. "Economists’ interest in collective decision after World War II: a history," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 23-44, July.
    10. Hemmer, H.-R., 1974. "Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Projektbewertung in Entwicklungsländern," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 11.
    11. Robert Inman, 1981. "On setting the agenda for Pennsylvania school finance reform: An exercise in giving policy advice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 449-474, January.
    12. Erhun KULA, 2006. "The social discount rate in cost benefit analysis: the British experience and lessons to be learned," Departmental Working Papers 2006-19, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    13. Michael Spackman, 2011. "Government discounting controversies: the valuation of social time preference," GRI Working Papers 68, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    14. E Kula, 1985. "An Empirical Investigation on the Social Time-Preference Rate for the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(2), pages 199-212, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992154743402676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vesa Sivunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.