IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iis/dispap/iiisdp210.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Baturo
  • Julia Grey

Abstract

What factors explain the wave of adoption of the flat tax in Eastern Europe — a policy that was all but unmentionable in the rest of the world? We argue that, once the first few successes were underway, governments with liberal outlooks toward taxation adopted the reform through a process of rational learning: an often-radically new government will tend to adopt the policy based on successful implementation of its neighbors. Our contribution to the literature on the political economy of taxation is threefold. First, we show that, both theoretically and empirically, the existing work on taxation does not apply to the flat tax revolution in the post-communist countries. Second, we take into consideration the need and the difficulty of measuring ideology of Eastern European political parties. Third, we approach the issue of policy diffusion by explicitly modeling the different mechanisms that might underlie the process. We also find that the presence of other market-minded reforms do not predict adoption of the flat tax.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Baturo & Julia Grey, 2007. "Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp210, IIIS.
  • Handle: RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp210
    Note: Length:
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tcd.ie/triss/assets/PDFs/iiis/iiisdp210.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Keen & Yitae Kim & Ricardo Varsano, 2008. "The “flat tax(es)”: principles and experience," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 15(6), pages 712-751, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maeve (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cetcdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.