IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00216.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Validity Study of Tests for Executive Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Saiyadain M S
  • Monappa Arun

Abstract

Several reasons have been offered for the depressed values of coefficients of correlation between performance evaluation scores and test scores for tests that otherwise seem to have high validity. Most of these studies have concerned themselves with only the first year performance measure. This study was undertaken to broad base the validity design by including performance measures of 3 subsequent years. Data were collected on the test and performance scores of executives from three organizations. The results indicate that though test scores may not show significant relationship with the first year performance appraisal score, they do show positive and significant relationship with 2nd and/or 3rd year performance appraisal scores. The rationales of the results are discussed. Analysis of the test and performance appraisal scores of these who left organizations at various stages have also been carried out to examine the rationale.

Suggested Citation

  • Saiyadain M S & Monappa Arun, 1976. "Validity Study of Tests for Executive Selection," IIMA Working Papers WP1976-12-01_00216, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.