IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/12914.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business Dispute Resolution: Taking Arbitration Clause Seriously

Author

Listed:
  • Agarwal, Anurag K.

Abstract

Dispute resolution through arbitration is the chosen method for businesses, however, it has often been experienced that due to a poorly drafted arbitration clause in the main contract or in a separate contract, there is no effective arbitration between the parties and there is a new dispute regarding the existence of the arbitration clause, which has to be resolved at the preliminary stage so as to enable the parties to take part in arbitration proceedings or go ahead with litigation in the public courts. The possibility of a decision regarding the interpretation of arbitration clause be appealed in a higher court depends on the nature of parties and the amount at stake. Litigious parties, not willing to budge even a little, have no qualms in fighting it out till the highest court. And, in this process the original dispute takes a back seat. The paper examines some of the interesting disputes regarding the arbitration clause, which were decided by courts, and could have easily been avoided had the parties been cautious at the time of entering into the contract. The paper also provides suggestions for some common and avoidable problems to help businesses save time, effort and money which otherwise get wasted in getting the dispute resolution clause interpreted in the courts.

Suggested Citation

  • Agarwal, Anurag K., 2014. "Business Dispute Resolution: Taking Arbitration Clause Seriously," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-09-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:12914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/7360478032014-09-02.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:12914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.