IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/wpaper/wp96-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Some Unpleasant Arithmetic Concerning Unification

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Noland

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Barring a second war on the Korean peninsula, Korean economic integration will occur, be it through successful economic reform and opening in the North, collapse and absorption along the lines of the German case, or a period of "muddling through" in which the North Korean government makes hesitant and insufficient economic reforms, and the South is drawn into supporting the North economically to stave off collapse. Whatever the mechanism, certain processes of economic integration such as increased integration of product markets, and the movement of labor-intensive light manufacturing industries from the South to North, are likely to occur regardless of the political specifics of reunification. Moreover, the divergence of economic conditions between the North and South has grown so wide, that the costs of unification, defined as the capital investment in North Korea necessary to raise incomes in the North to a sufficiently high level to choke off mass migration to the South, are so large as to be improbably attained. As a consequence, even under optimistic scenarios, there will be enormous economic incentives for North Koreans to move South. This has important implications for current South Korean domestic policy, regardless of the specific political modality under which economic integration occurs. The imperative for South Korean policy will be to minimize the burdens imposed on South Korean taxpayers by the exigency of financing the economic reconstruction of the North. This requires policies to encourage foreign capital, specifically foreign private capital, to flow into North and South Korea. Specifically, South Korea needs to continue to improve its foreign direct investment regime, as well as encourage the development of efficient domestic bond markets of all maturities which can be used to mobilize large sums of capital when the need arises. Creating this capacity to mobilize global private capital quickly will be particularly important if economic integration occurs through Northern collapse and the extension of South Korean laws and institutions throughout the unified Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Noland, 1996. "Some Unpleasant Arithmetic Concerning Unification," Working Paper Series WP96-13, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp96-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/some-unpleasant-arithmetic-concerning-unification
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Noland, 2007. "South Korea's Experience with International Capital Flows," NBER Chapters, in: Capital Controls and Capital Flows in Emerging Economies: Policies, Practices, and Consequences, pages 481-528, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp96-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.