IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb18-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

KORUS Amendments: Minor Adjustments Fixed What Trump Called "Horrible Trade Deal"

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey J. Schott

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Euijin Jung

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

The amended Korea-US Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA)—quickly negotiated and signed in September 2018—involves only limited changes to the original pact. Schott and Jung assess what was changed as a result of the negotiations and, importantly, what was left off the agenda. The revised deal rectifies problems with Korean implementation of KORUS obligations, revises Korean auto regulations, and extends US import protection for trucks but does not address agricultural issues or rules of origin for autos and parts. On balance, the modest revisions will restrict, not enlarge, bilateral trade. While it has reduced short-term trade friction between Seoul and Washington, the KORUS amendment has not resolved the Trump administration’s fundamental concerns about bilateral trade in autos and parts. Korea remains vulnerable to new US trade protection in that sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey J. Schott & Euijin Jung, 2018. "KORUS Amendments: Minor Adjustments Fixed What Trump Called "Horrible Trade Deal"," Policy Briefs PB18-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb18-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/korus-amendments-minor-adjustments-fixed-what-trump-called-horrible-trade
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikio Kuwayama, 2019. "TPP11 (CPTPP): Its Implications for Japan-Latin America Trade Relations in Times of Uncertainty," Discussion Paper Series DP2019-05, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    2. Steven J. Davis, 2019. "Rising Policy Uncertainty," NBER Working Papers 26243, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb18-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.