IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb13-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dealing with Cybersecurity Threats Posed by Globalized Information Technology Suppliers

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore H. Moran

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Theodore H. Moran cites recent instances of the US government intervening to block foreign producers of information technology (IT) from selling goods and services to US firms and argues that such actions based on the nationality of the foreign firm is ineffective, discriminatory, and unfair. The dangers and risks of compromise of US national security are real. But in a world where supply chains of IT companies of every nationality are thoroughly globalized, a better way to protect national security would be to establish a multilateral nondiscriminatory system to ensure the integrity of equipment, software, patches, and upgrades from all sources. Much remains to be done to establish an appropriate regime to protect national security and also the rights of investors and companies doing business with foreign firms. The goal should be to strike a balance between protecting national security without discouraging foreigners from investing in and doing business with US firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore H. Moran, 2013. "Dealing with Cybersecurity Threats Posed by Globalized Information Technology Suppliers," Policy Briefs PB13-11, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb13-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/dealing-cybersecurity-threats-posed-globalized-information-technology
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore H. Moran & Lindsay Oldenski, 2013. "Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Benefits, Suspicions, and Risks with Special Attention to FDI from China," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 6604, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "Chinese Investment and CFIUS: Time for an Updated (and Revised) Perspective," Policy Briefs PB15-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keyan Lai, 2021. "National security and FDI policy ambiguity: A commentary," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 496-505, December.
    2. C. Fred Bergsten & Cathleen Cimino & Gary Clyde Hufbauer & J. Bradford Jensen & Sean Miner & Theodore H. Moran & Jeffrey J. Schott, . "Toward a US-China Investment Treaty," PIIE Briefings, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number PIIEB15-1, January.
    3. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "Chinese Investment and CFIUS: Time for an Updated (and Revised) Perspective," Policy Briefs PB15-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    4. Youngho Kang & Unjung Whang, 2018. "To Whom Does Outward FDI Give Jobs?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 613-639, July.
    5. Cheche Duan & Yicheng Zhou & Dehong Shen & Shengqiao Lin & Wei Gong & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "The Misunderstanding of China’s Investment, and a Clarification: “Faustian Bargain” or “Good Bargain”? On the OFDI Data of Central and Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Sophie Meunier & Brian Burgoon & Wade Jacoby, 2014. "The politics of hosting Chinese investment in Europe—an introduction," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 109-126, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb13-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.