IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb03-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rules Against Earnings Stripping: Wrong Answer to Corporate Inversions

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Ariel Assa

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

The tax-driven expatriation of US corporations is a troubling phenomenon. In a "corporate inversion," a new foreign corporation, typically located in a low-tax or no-tax country, replaces the existing US parent corporation of a multinational enterprise (MNE). The US corporation then becomes a subsidiary of the new foreign parent. Since the US tax treatment of an MNE operating in the United States is sig-nificantly less favorable when the top-tier parent corporation is a domestic rather than a foreign corporation, the inversion transaction averts a substantial amount of US tax. Inversions have attracted adverse attention from tax specialists, media, the US Treasury Department, and Congress. In the wake of September 11, it seemed downright unpatriotic for US firms to invert as a way of skimping on their tax payments.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Ariel Assa, 2003. "Rules Against Earnings Stripping: Wrong Answer to Corporate Inversions," Policy Briefs PB03-07, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb03-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/rules-against-earnings-stripping-wrong-answer-corporate-inversions
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Clyde Hufbauer, 2002. "The Foreign Sales Corporation: Reaching the Last Act?," Policy Briefs PB02-10, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Paul L. E. Grieco, 2004. "Senator Kerry on Corporate Tax Reform: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Prescription," Policy Briefs PB04-03, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Ben Goodrich, 2003. "Steel Policy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," Policy Briefs PB03-01, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    2. Christian Ketels, 2007. "Industrial Policy in the United States," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 147-167, December.
    3. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Ben Goodrich, 2003. "Next Move in Steel: Revocation or Retaliation?," Policy Briefs PB03-10, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    4. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Paul L. E. Grieco, 2004. "Senator Kerry on Corporate Tax Reform: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Prescription," Policy Briefs PB04-03, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    5. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Debashis Chakraborty & Julien Chaisse, 2014. "Influence of Subsidies on Exports empirical estimates,policy evidences and regulatory prospects," Working Papers 1422, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb03-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.