Author
Abstract
Although health economics may be considered to be the application of economics as a way of thinking about questions regarding the production, maintenance and distribution of health, health economists have historically paid more attention to some production inputs than to others. Health economics has been mainly, even if not exclusively, health care economics. Relatively little attention has been paid by economists to the role of other (non-health-care) determinants of health, or to the nature of the production process underlying the health of populations. This has recently begun to change, however, as the attention of both researchers and policy-makers has shifted from the downstream question, “How do people get well once they are ill?”, to the upstream question, “How do people get ill?” A recent example of the interdisciplinary collaboration of health economists in questions related to the determinants of health is found in work from the Population Health Program of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. This group has been engaged for the past seven years in extracting from the international and cross-disciplinary literature a new understanding of “heterogeneities” in health status -- why some groups within populations are healthier than others. Many of the apparent underlying `causal’ factors -- genetic predisposition, culture, stress, control over one’s professional and personal environments, nurturing and enrichment in early childhood -- are not topics on which health economists generally have much to contribute. But others -- income; employment; economic growth; the distribution of income and wealth -- are rather closer to home. The key message from this work is the complex (and as yet far from completely understood) interplay between these myriad economic and other influences, and the equally complex biological interplay among immune, endocrine and cardiovascular systems (at least) in explaining how these influences get translated at the cellular level into ill health or premature death. This then raises several sets of challenges -- conceptual, methodologic, empirical, practical, and political -- for researchers attempting to push out the frontiers of understanding of the relative importance of various determinants, for policymakers attempting to act on new knowledge about determinants, and for health economists interested in participating in the collaborative cross-disciplinary efforts required for both research and policy development. Perhaps the biggest single challenge, for everyone concerned about the production of health in modern economies, is to find the proper balance between investment in the quality of the social fabric necessary to facilitate and sustain economic progress, and investment in the economic growth itself essential for providing the capacity to sustain the quality of social environments over long periods.
Suggested Citation
Greg Stoddart, 1995.
"The Challenge of Producing Health in Modern Economies,"
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series
1995-15, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Handle:
RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199515
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Charles Courtemanche & Samir Soneji & Rusty Tchernis, 2013.
"Modeling Area-Level Health Rankings,"
NBER Working Papers
19450, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Lori J. Curtis, 2001.
"Lone Motherhood and Health Status,"
Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 27(3), pages 335-356, September.
- Emmanuelle Pierard, 2009.
"The effect of physician supply on health status as measured in the NPHS,"
Working Papers
0901, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2009.
- John Nixon & Philippe Ulmann, 2006.
"The relationship between health care expenditure and health outcomes,"
The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(1), pages 7-18, March.
- Philippe Ulmann, 2004.
"Est-il possible (souhaitable) de maîtriser les dépenses de santé ?,"
Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 76(3), pages 19-37.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lyn Sauberli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chepaca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.