IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/80psy2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Motor (But Not Auditory) Attention Affects Syntactic Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Pokhoday

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Christoph Scheepers

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Yury Shtyrov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Andriy Myachykov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of syntactic choice in sentence production is a salient topic in psycholinguistics. Existing evidence suggests that syntactic choice results from an interplay between linguistic and non-linguistic factors, and a speaker’s attention to the elements of a described event represents one such factor. Whereas multimodal accounts of attention suggest a role for different modalities in this process, existing studies examining attention effects in syntactic choice are primarily based on visual cueing paradigms. Hence, it remains unclear whether attentional effects on syntactic choice are limited to the visual modality or may be subject to cross-modal interaction. The current study addressed this issue. Native English participants viewed and described line drawings of simple transitive events while their attention was directed to the location of the agent or the patient of the depicted event by means of either an auditory (monaural beep) or a motor (unilateral key press) lateral cue. Our results show an effect of cue location, with participants producing more passive-voice descriptions in the patient-cued conditions. Crucially, this cue location effect emerged in the motor-cue but not in the auditory-cue condition, as confirmed by a reliable interaction between cue location (agent vs. patient) and cue type (auditory vs. motor). Our data suggest that attentional effects on the speaker’s syntactic choices are modality dependent and appear to be more prominent in the visuomotor domain than in the auditory domain

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Pokhoday & Christoph Scheepers & Yury Shtyrov & Andriy Myachykov, 2017. "Motor (But Not Auditory) Attention Affects Syntactic Choice," HSE Working papers WP BRP 80/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:80psy2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2017/10/10/1159398377/80PSY2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    visual; auditory; motor; attention; sentence production; syntactic choice; priming;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:80psy2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.