IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/45-law-2015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Systemacity Of Law: A Phantasm?

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Antonov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The subject-matter of this article is the “systemacity of law” concept and its methodological feedback. Continuing a series of articles on this subject, the author focuses on the internal rationality of claims about systemic character of law. This rationality is embedded in the legal thinking of Modernity and reveals itself in the belief in rational nature of law. According to this style of legal thinking, such internal rationality impedes law from being chaotically or randomly organised and structured. Therefore, law shall have a reasonably organized structure, even if in reality it does not have such a structure. In this way, the belief in an internal rationality of law transforms itself into the requirement for the rational organization of law. These two elements—belief in an internal rationality and the requirement of rational organization of law—are the pillars of the dogmatic conception of law which was established in Begriffsjurisprudenz of the 19th century and which still holds sway over contemporary continental legal thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Antonov, 2015. "Systemacity Of Law: A Phantasm?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 45/LAW/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:45/law/2015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2015/02/10/1091810141/45LAW2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    normative systems; legal system; positivity of law; unity of law; identity of legal system; phantasm; coherence;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:45/law/2015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.