IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/11-ir-2014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Role Of The European Court Of Justice In The Third Pillar: Does Not It Grow Too Fast?

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Grigoriev

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The article discusses the role of the European court of justice in the so called third pillar of the European Union. This role, from virtually non-existent in the early 1990s when the third pillar was introduced into the institutional structure of the European Union, grew extensively throughout the 1990-2000s and by the time the pillar structure was abandoned in the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the Court has already effectively escaped its limitations by its own case-law. This provides a curious example of judicialization – the process whereby legal institutions gain political power and engage into taking politically salient decisions alongside, and sometimes even instead of politicians acting within majoritarian institutions. By reviewing the ECJ case-law in the third pillar the paper attempts to establish the effect of judicialization on the EU, to evaluate it and to answer the question whether the role of the ECJ grows too fast in the third pillar.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Grigoriev, 2014. "Role Of The European Court Of Justice In The Third Pillar: Does Not It Grow Too Fast?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 11/IR/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:11/ir/2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2014/12/29/1103811523/11IR2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel Delattre & Pascal Moulette, 2012. "L'évaluation du personnel : quel dispositif pour un management pérenne et équitable ?," Post-Print halshs-00952608, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Courts; jurisprudence.;

      JEL classification:

      • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:11/ir/2014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.