IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/08psy2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relations of the new circle of 19 values to behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Butenko

    (PhD, National Research University Higher School of Economics. International Scientific-Educational Laboratory for Socio-Cultural Research)

  • Shalom Schwartz

    (PhD, National Research University Higher School of Economics. International Scientific-Educational Laboratory for Socio-Cultural Research)

Abstract

The revised theory of basic individual values (Schwartz, et al. 2012) is intended to provide more powerful prediction and explanation of behavior than the original theory of ten basic values. It distinguishes 19 more narrowly defined values. These values express motivations that can be linked conceptually in a more precise manner to the motivations that presumably underlie behaviors. There is evidence that each of these newly distinguished values improves our understanding of the value bases of attitudes (Schwartz, et al. 2012). Thus far, no studies have been conducted to assess relations between the 19 values and a set of relevant behaviors. It is critical for the theory to demonstrate (or reject) that those values not present in the original theory that the revised theory distinguishes add predictive power. The paper presents results of a study of relations between 19 values and everyday behaviors conducted in Russia in 2012 to answer these issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Butenko & Shalom Schwartz, 2013. "Relations of the new circle of 19 values to behaviors," HSE Working papers WP BRP 08/PSY/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:08psy2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/03/02/1293259880/08PSY2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    theory of basic individual values; everyday behavior; predictive power of values.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:08psy2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.