IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nhhfms/2025_008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pareto Optimal Insurance Policies: Kinks with or without frictions

Author

Listed:
  • Aase, Knut K.

    (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics)

Abstract

We analyze optimal risk sharing between a customer and an in surer, and present alternative explanations for the prevalence of kinks in Pareto optimal contracts, like deductibles and upper bounds as in XL-contracts. Linear indemnity functions have primarily been considered in the literature. We focus on nonlinear contracts, which can be explained on the basic of different preferences held by the parties involved. In this setting we derive Pareto optimal contracts with ”near” deductibles and ”near’ caps, which we illustrate by examples. Lastly we consider a model based on non-verifiability where the insurer is risk-neutral. We change to a setting where both the cedent and the reinsurer are strictly risk averse. This rationalizes both an endogenous upper cap and a deductible, retaining compensations for risk bearing.

Suggested Citation

  • Aase, Knut K., 2025. "Pareto Optimal Insurance Policies: Kinks with or without frictions," Discussion Papers 2025/8, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2025_008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3180605
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pareto optimal risk sharing; nonlinear contracts; XL-contracts; non-verifiability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2025_008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stein Fossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfnhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.