Author
Abstract
During the 1990s, three of the major Scandinavian media groups entered new markets, two of them – Swedish Bonnier Group through Dagens Industri - and the Stenbeck Group through Metro came to use new internationalization models (and business models) which later became widely copied by other media companies. At the same time, Norwegian Schibsted chose to enter new markets through a traditional acquisition model. However, despite initial successes, both Dagens Industri and Metro withdrew from the new markets, in many cases following major losses. Schibsted came out better. Using case studies based on archival and oral history sources from the three media groups I study the internationalization processes, and through synchronous and diachronic comparative analysis, examine why the different media companies chose the strategies they chose, what were the success factors and why the new internationalization strategies, despite initial successes, failed to produce the intended long-term results for the two companies that used them. There are many cases where media companies have entered new markets. However, these available Scandinavian company cases are rather unique in that the accounted for a significant portion of the media market in their home markets, shared the same (or similar) institutional environment, internationalized close in time, had access to the same (newly opened Eastern European) markets. The combination of conditions makes it possible to make a substantial and general contribution to research on an important but difficult study, as well as to the theory of internationalization. Since the home markets of the aforementioned companies were small language areas and they could therefore not internationalize by (like newspapers like the Financial Times or International Herald Tribune) distributing existing products across borders. Instead, two of the companies studied internationalized by taking the) very unusual step to publish more or less adapted editions of an existing newspaper, but in a language other than the original publication. This makes Metro’s and Dagens Industri's internationalization strategies interesting in themselves. We have found that local entrepreneurs, particularly the self-organization among these entrepreneurs, played an important role when the newspaper companies entered new markets. It is also found that business models in the newspaper industry that focus on the search for local knowledge are driving the success of market entry. Further, we also found that the organization of the media group, the degree of autonomy among the foreign ventures, the differences in corporate culture – and previous experiences of internationalization – shaped the choices of entry modes and the outcome of the ventures
Suggested Citation
Lakomaa, Erik & Wahlund, Richard, 2020.
"The Internationalization of the Scandinavian Newspaper Industry 1990-2010,"
SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History
2020:2, Stockholm School of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:hhs:haechi:2020_002
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
More about this item
Keywords
Internationalization;
Newspapers;
Scandinavia;
Entry mode;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
- M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration
- N34 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: 1913-
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:haechi:2020_002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Erik Lakomaa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dehhsse.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.