IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/her/chedps/37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost effectiveness analysis of school based Mantoux screening for TB in Central Sydney, CHERE Discussion Paper No 37

Author

Listed:
  • John Slater

Abstract

A cost effectiveness analysis of differing school based TB infection screening regimes was conducted for 1996 populations of Year 1 and Year 8 students who attended schools in the areas of Central Sydney Area Health Service and South Western Sydney Area Health Service. The costs of screening would be partially offset by savings in future costs of treating adult cases of TB disease. Screening the high risk group of Year 8 students was found to be the most cost effective screening option. The cost per case prevented and the cost per death prevented were comparable with other health programs which are judged to be ?value for money?. Screening Year 1 students was found to be not as effective nor as cost effective. Universal screening would prevent more cases of adult TB disease than targeted screening but at a relatively high cost per case.

Suggested Citation

  • John Slater, 1998. "Cost effectiveness analysis of school based Mantoux screening for TB in Central Sydney, CHERE Discussion Paper No 37," Discussion Papers 37, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/dp37.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1998
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TB; cost effectiveness; school based screening;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liz Chinchen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chusyau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.