IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-03113265.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Des questions évaluatives pour améliorer les politiques régionales

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Lamotte

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

Le CESER rappelle dans ce rapport son attachement aux principes de l'évaluation, outil majeur de la vie démocratique à ne pas confondre avec le pilotage et regrette l'affaiblissement de cette pratique en Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. Chargé par le législateur de contribuer à l'évaluation des politiques régionales, il propose pour deux politiques régionales majeures, formation professionnelle et Contrat Ambition Territoires, des questions évaluatives qui reflètent les préoccupations de la société civile organisée. Le CESER appelle l'Exécutif régional à se saisir de ces questions pour relancer une démarche d'évaluation systématique de ses politiques, en particulier pour les politiques partenariales Etat/Région. Il s'agit d'une exigence démocratique encore renforcée par le contexte de crise sanitaire, qui appelle à la mise en oeuvre de politiques publiques ambitieuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Lamotte, 2020. "Des questions évaluatives pour améliorer les politiques régionales," Working Papers halshs-03113265, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03113265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03113265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.