IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-04982990.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the 'Ethos' of AI-driven Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Prashant Mahajan

    (R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming higher education (HE) by enabling personalized learning, automating administrative processes, and enhancing decision-making. However, AI adoption presents significant ethical and institutional challenges, including algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, and governance inconsistencies. This study introduces the Human-Driven AI in Higher Education (HD-AIHED) Framework, an adaptive and structured model designed to integrate human intelligence (HI) into every phase of the AI lifecycle-adoption, design, deployment, evaluation, and exploration. Unlike conventional AI models that prioritize automation, HD-AIHED emphasizes human-centered governance, ethical compliance, and participatory decision-making to ensure that AI enhances rather than replaces human agency in HE. The framework aligns AI applications with both institutional and student needs, fostering trust, adaptability, and transparency. Its dual-layered approach integrates AI across both the AI lifecycle and the student lifecycle, ensuring context-sensitive, equitable, and goal-oriented AI implementation. A key contribution of this study is its regionally adaptable approach, recognizing variations in technological infrastructure and policy landscapes. Additionally, the integration of SWOC (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges) analysis during the adoption phase allows HE institutions to evaluate AI readiness, mitigate risks, and refine governance structures, while the exploration phase ensures long-term adaptability, scalability, sustainability, and AI promotion through continuous research, innovation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. To ensure AI remains a responsible enabler in HE, this study advocates for the establishment of University/HE Institutional AI Ethical Review Boards, alignment with global regulatory frameworks (e.g., UNESCO AI Ethics Guidelines, GDPR, Sustainable Development Goal 4), and the promotion of inclusive and transparent AI adoption policies. Key insights from the HD-AIHED model highlight its role in bridging AI research gaps and overcoming real-time challenges in global HE institutions. The framework offers tailored strategies for diverse educational contexts, including developed and emerging countries, ensuring that AI implementation is contextually relevant and ethically sound. By emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration among policymakers, educators, industry leaders, and students, this study envisions AI as an ethical and equitable force for innovation in HE. Ultimately, the HD-AIHED model serves as a catalyst for AI inclusivity rather than exclusion and a driver of educational equity rather than disparity by embedding the ethos of AIHED into higher education systems. Future research should focus on the empirical validation of HD-AIHED through institutional case studies, AI bias audits, and longitudinal assessments to ensure ethical integrity, transparency, and sustainability in AI deployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Prashant Mahajan, 2025. "What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the 'Ethos' of AI-driven Higher Education," Working Papers hal-04982990, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04982990
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04982990v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04982990v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04982990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.