IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-04982827.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance analysis of the alternative stock index vs. MASI using the GARCH model
[Analyse des performances de l'indice boursier alternatif par rapport au MASI à l'aide du modèle GARCH]

Author

Listed:
  • Ismail Nasiri

    (FSJES Tanger, FSJEST - Faculté des Sciences Juridiques, Économiques et Sociales Université Abdelmalek Esaâdi Tanger – Maroc)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims at analyzing the performance of the alternative stock market index (SPMII) compared to its counterpart (MASI) by the S&P model. methodology: The study constructed over a period from 01/01/2017 to 12/31/2018. Using the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test to investigate the stationarity of the two stock market indices. Then, we estimated the average model for the ARCH effect by the ARCH-LM test and, by GARCH type models with the generalized error distribution (GED), as well as, forecasting their future variations by using the standard loss functions (symmetric) to evaluate the forecasting performance of competing models: (RMSE), (MAE), (MAPE) and (TIC). Findings: The curve of SPMII varies in a quasi-stable manner, unlike its counterpart which climbs significantly, given its date of birth, which is considered old, compared to the other which has just been created. The series of their returns show ARCH effects, which proves the impact of the heteroscedasticity effect. Table IV revealed that strong ARCH and GARCH effects are evident in the returns, inferring the appearance of a leverage effect. The results show that the EGARCH (1, 1) model outperforms all other models in predicting the volatility of (SPMII) and (MASI) returns. The results show that the SPMII is more stable due to its selection of less volatile companies, while the MASI exhibits greater volatility because of its age and the fluctuating performances of the companies. The volatility clustering effects and the leverage effect indicate a more pronounced response to negative shocks. Since the SPMII is recent, there could be unassessed temporal biases. Originality: This study compares, for the first time in Morocco, the performance of an Islamic stock market index (SPMII) with its traditional counterpart (MASI) using the Standard & Poor's model. It highlights the specific features of the Islamic index, its current and future fluctuations, and its potential as an investment alternative in the Moroccan financial market. We have noticed the absence of an Islamic stock index in Morocco. This has motivated us to design this index and study its performance. To date, the index has not yet been officially created on the Moroccan stock market. Governments should adopt favorable policies for Islamic indices and offer tax incentives to stimulate the market. Strengthen corporate transparency and governance to attract more capital. Encourage international cooperation to harmonize Islamic financial standards and widely integrate these indices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismail Nasiri, 2024. "Performance analysis of the alternative stock index vs. MASI using the GARCH model [Analyse des performances de l'indice boursier alternatif par rapport au MASI à l'aide du modèle GARCH]," Working Papers hal-04982827, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04982827
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04982827v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04982827v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04982827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.