Author
Abstract
The complexity of temporal matters in organizations has led researchers to question the linear and objective view of temporality and, instead, to develop a process perspective, seeing organizational temporality as a non-linear, narrative, creative and on-going social construction, a 'temporal work'. This paper addresses the theoretical and practical question: 'which conceptualization can help organizational actors to manage the temporal dimension of their action, and researchers to understand temporal work?' It proposes, as suggested by Paul Ricoeur's narrative approach to temporality, that the chronological and the narrative temporalities not only co-exist, conflict, or complement each other, but construct each other, as consubstantial dimensions of narrative organizing processes, and that their mutual construction requires a third, mediating and not strictly temporal dimension: a narrative logic. By 'narrative logic', following Ricoeur, we do not mean linear causality, but complex causation relations. We apply Ricoeur's threefold conceptualization of "emplotment", integrating chronological time (CT), narrative time (NT) and narrative logic (NL), to a field study concerning the management of work safety in building projects. In light of the case study, we identify some further theoretical, managerial and methodological contributions of Ricoeur's perspective: the plurality of narrative frames potentially involved in the emplotment of a situation, leading to distinct and potentially contradictory views of organizing temporality and therefore of safety management practices; actors' continual reconstruction of the future of their activity and redesign of the culturally available narrative schemes; the construction of a fiction of time reversibility, achieved through emplotment of collective action, and the ensuing risk of turning a blind eye to the irreversibility of experience.
Suggested Citation
Philippe Lorino & Tricard Benoît, 2025.
"The narrative construction of temporality and meaning in organizing: A field study of work safety management. Année 2025,"
Working Papers
hal-04967641, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04967641
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://essec.hal.science/hal-04967641v2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04967641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.