Author
Abstract
This policy paper analyses Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) and their growing role in the making of a more active EU industrial policy. It starts out by discussing three waves of IPCEIs which are linked to particular phases in the development of this instrument. From 2018 to 2021 the first wave triggered an experimentation and learning phase which was followed by a second wave, in which IPCEIs could consolidate due to the availability of European funding and some improvements in their governance. With the continued popularity and an emerging third wave of IPCEIs, we need to reflect on the question whether they are fit for the long run. This policy paper sets out to address this question based on an analysis of IPCEI development and implementation processes, interviews with stakeholders, and the available literature. It makes recommendations on how to best transform IPCEIs from repeated and strongly national ad hoc exercises to a more permanent and effective tool of EU industrial policy. This policy paper suggests, first, that the EU and its Member States need to agree on more predictable IPCEI funding. In the best-case scenario, new European funding would substitute for the European recovery plan on a more permanent basis, allowing EU co-financing for future IPCEIs. In addition, more budgetary leeway should be given to Member States willing to invest in common industrial policy priorities. Further improvements for the predictability of IPCEI funding could also be achieved by modifications of national budgeting. Second, there is still significant room for improvement for the current IPCEI governance arrangements. At the national level, there should be further harmonisation and simplification of bureaucratic procedures. The creation of a European exchange forum for Member States to discuss best practice examples could be useful in this regard. In addition, an EU level support structure for IPCEI applicants and participants could help ensure that enterprises, especially from Member States with lower technical and administrative capacities, can have a more equal access to IPCEIs. Finally, the Commission needs to increase its resources to accelerate the lengthy notification processes of IPCEIs.
Suggested Citation
Andreas Eisl, 2022.
"EU industrial policy in the making. From ad hoc exercises to key instrument: how to make IPCEIs fit for the long run,"
Working Papers
hal-04616546, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04616546
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04616546
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04616546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.