IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-04189991.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conservation auctions: an online double constraint reverse auction experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Adrien Coiffard

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Raphaële Préget

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Mabel Tidball

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

Conservation auctions are reverse auctions designed to allocate payments for environmental services. We perform an online experiment to study a reverse auction that combines both a budget and a target constraint, i.e., a double constraint auction. We compare the performance of this auction format to target and budget constraint formats according to three different criteria: the number of units purchased, the budget spent and the unit cost. Our results show that the performance of the double constraint auction, compared with announcing only a target constraint or a budget constraint, depends on the buyer's objective(s). Indeed, our main conclusion is that no ranking satisfies our three criteria simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrien Coiffard & Raphaële Préget & Mabel Tidball, 2024. "Conservation auctions: an online double constraint reverse auction experiment," Working Papers hal-04189991, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04189991
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04189991v3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04189991v3/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04189991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.