IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03901206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do different people report the same social norms?

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Castillo

    (VCEE - Vienna Center for Experimental Economics, University of Vienna)

  • Lawrence Choo

    (China Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)

  • Veronika Grimm

    (FAU - Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg = University of Erlangen-Nuremberg)

Abstract

If the Krupka-Weber (2013) norm-elicitation task captures pre-existing social norms, then the elicited norms should be independent of one's role in a game or one's social preferences. We test this idea in a complex game that features rich interactions. We find that different people, even when they have conflicting incentives, report the same social norms. Our results further validate the use of the Krupka-Weber task to measure social norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Castillo & Lawrence Choo & Veronika Grimm, 2022. "Do different people report the same social norms?," Working Papers hal-03901206, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03901206
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03901206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03901206/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chunpeng Fan & Donghui Zhang & Cun-Hui Zhang, 2011. "On Sample Size of the Kruskal–Wallis Test with Application to a Mouse Peritoneal Cavity Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 213-224, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogliacino, Francesco & Aycinena, Diego & Kimbrough, Erik, 2024. "Eliciting normative expectations with coordination games allowing for neutral report," SocArXiv y3fha, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominika Gajdosikova & Katarina Valaskova & Tomas Kliestik & Maria Kovacova, 2023. "Research on Corporate Indebtedness Determinants: A Case Study of Visegrad Group Countries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Shi‐Xiao Wang & Wen‐Min Lu & Shiu‐Wan Hung, 2020. "Industrial upgrading efficiency and free markets in emerging economies: A two‐stage meta‐frontier approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1084-1095, September.
    3. Ehlinaz Torun Kayabaşı & Şenol Çelik & Ahmet Emre Demirtaş, 2022. "Evaluation of Kartepe Village Production Patterns and Farmer Profiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social norms; norm elicitation; laboratory experiment; methodology; ultimatum game;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03901206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.